Mike McGonegal for the Michigan House

Mike McGonegal is running for the Michigan House of Representatives from the 66th District, and this is his official campaign blog. It is monitored and posted b y his Communications Director.

11/03/2006

Here we go again: Another case of our opponent saying do as I say not as I do

This is just one more example of Mr. Ward doing something he says he is against and then he goes out and does it. Voters in Genoa Township - where we know of for sure so far- were greeted with the voice of Mr. Ward extolling the virtues of his favorite candidate for governor. That’s fine, but then don’t say you “…opposes the use of the typically 30-second ads that are being telephoned to residents and left on answering machines throughout the county, state and country.” That’s called both a lie and hypocrisy.

We have seen this before from Mr. Ward. Last month he agreed with his favorite candidate for governor that all travel paid for by lobbyists should be banned (See our posts on 10/2 and 10/4), and then he goes on an all-expenses paid junket by lobbyists to Taiwan. This robo call episode is just one more example in a pattern of Mr. Ward saying do as I say not as I do. Unfortunately for him, adults don’t buy into that argument, and not many kids do either. How do you not call it a campaign call when Mr. Ward clearly identifies himself and his office? We are fighting for name recognition on a shoestring budget, and he has someone’s millions and the taxpayers doing it for him.

Mike is not against robo calls. He would have told you his position if the newspaper had asked him. Why they did not ask any of the non-incumbents for comments I don’t really know, but I have my suspicions. The calls should not be banned or placed on a Do Not Call List because the 1st Amendment is very important to Mike. However, the calls should not exceed a certain length, and they should clearly state who paid for the call just like a TV, radio or print ad. Whether we would actually use them if we had the money is another question, and we are not sure we would use them. For the many of you who have met Mike at the door you know he prefers personal contact. At this point we are spending our limited funds locally, taking an ad out in today’s local daily newspaper and local radio station.

By Kristofer Karol DAILY PRESS & ARGUS
The recent blitz of recorded political messages, or "robo-calls" as they are called, are "ripe for a lot of dirty tricks," according to one local legislator.
State Rep. Chris Ward, R-Brighton Township, opposes the use of the typically 30-second ads that are being telephoned to residents and left on answering machines throughout the county, state and country.
"It's an environment that's ripe for a lot of dirty tricks, people calling and saying things that aren't true or are unsubstantiated," Ward said, adding there is no law requiring a tag line of who paid for the messages.
State Rep. Joe Hune, R-Hamburg Township, recently recorded a robo-call in support of Republican gubernatorial challenger Dick DeVos.
"I think that they work if you can't get out and meet the voters yourself," Hune said. "I should apologize because everyone opens their mailbox (and) it's full of literature. Every time they answer the phone, it's a politician. But soon it will be all over."
Neither Ward nor Hune are using robo-calls for their own re-election campaigns, with the latter saying he has received a "couple of anecdotal things" about robo-calls from people he's met while out in the field.
Both have said they wouldn't be opposed to adding robo-calls to the list of prohibited calls on the National Do Not Call Registry.
Joe Carney, chairman of the Livingston County Democrats, said he was unaware of any county Democratic candidates using robo-calls.
"(Republicans) probably have more money than all of us put together, so that has something to do with it, and they believe that they work," Carney said.
Several local politicians have been approached by DeVos' camp asking them to record messages in support of his candidacy.
State Sen. Valde Garcia, R-Marion Township, said he declined to do so because of scheduling conflicts. Garcia is not doing any robo-calls for his own campaign.
Ward said he recorded a message, but wasn't told if it would be used for a robo-call.
Meanwhile, Ward said politicians will continue to use robo-calls until everyone agrees to stop using them, which he hopes will one day happen.
"It's kind of like the Wild West of campaign-ing — anything goes" Ward said. "Our system is built on some level of accountability, and robo-calls have none."

10 Comments:

At 1:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins- not by strength but by perseverance.So I hope it goes for Mike.I like Mike because he is persistent and I can just imagine the great job he will do for our area in the capitol city.He came to my door and never has anybody seeking election appeared at my door.Thanks for the visit you have the gift and I hope enough people get the chance to meet you because I think the more you contact the more votes you will get.Come back any time.Sorry about the dog!

 
At 2:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chris Ward you are not a nice person and while I can lose some weight you'll never stop being mean.So don't be surprized to know you got a lot of us mad.So no vote for you from me and they say you read what they write about you on this web.So grow up.

 
At 3:41 PM, Blogger Communications guru said...

Welcome to the blog and thank you for your kind words, Clay. I have to admit Mike is a hard worker, and he also has thick skin. He’s not shy about talking to anyone, and it doesn’t bother him to have the door slammed in his face. Far too many people will cut you off as soon as they hear you are from the opposite political party, but if Mike gets the opportunity to talk to them and listen to them he wins them over. That is getting a little easier in Livingston County than in years past, and I think that’s because Mike is such a good communicator and because the political climate we are currently in.

Also welcome HS Classmate. You are certainly welcome to your feelings and welcome to express them. However, we are sticking just to Mr. Ward’s record here, but feel free to post in the future.

 
At 4:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I concur that Mr. Ward is guilty of misconduct as it relates to the land swap swindle.I voted for him in the past but not this time.Sorry Mr. Ward but you don't deserve my vote.

 
At 6:36 PM, Blogger Communications guru said...

Take you for both your input here, and especially your vote, Concerned. You will not regret it.

 
At 8:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Mike is not against robo calls."

You have to be kidding me? On the eve of the election, you actually take the time to make Mike's support of robo-calls a campaign issue! How dumb can you be?! People hate these things, including me! I can't believe Mike is coming out in favor of robo-calls. And you wanted the newspaper to quote him on that? Do you think that was going to get him some votes?

Dumb dumb dumb dumb ... this is John Kerry times ten.

He just lost my vote. I can't vote for Ward either because I can't stand him, but now I'm not voting for Mike either. I'm just going to leave that part of my ballot blank.

 
At 9:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are doing a dumb thing by not voting since Mr.Ward said to vote for Mike because he is less than a jerk than he is.Yet a no vote is better than a vote for that lusty ward.Why not write your own name on the ballot or post your address or write in Mrs.Ward that would show up chris as well as mike.If you don't have no body to vote for then you are a stupid idiot who may have had two many beers.

 
At 9:52 PM, Blogger Communications guru said...

We are very sorry to lose your vote over something like robo calls, but there is a much larger and more important issue here; the Constitution and the 1st Amendment. It’s a clear violation of Freedom of Speech to not allow someone to make a recorded political message on the phone. I don’t think banning robo calls would stand up to a court challenge.

I personally have no problem with the calls, unless I hear a false claim in an attack call. Then I want to know you to complain to. What Mike is proposing is requiring who ever is paying for the calls to disclose it during the call. I can guarantee you this; half of the attack calls will stop.

Mike has never used a robo call, but that does not mean the 1st Amendment should be violated because of some slight inconvenience. How did I make “robo-calls a campaign issue?” I was commenting on a front page article from the newspaper with the largest circulation in the 66th District. The really important thing that you missed is Mr. Ward, again, says he is against something – robo calls in this case – and goes ahead and does what he says he's against. Yes, we wanted the newspaper to get Mike's opinion. Sen.. Kerry screwed up the punch line in a joke; I fail to see the relevant to this issue.

We are very sorry and disappointed to lose your vote, but the 1st Amendment and Freedom of Speech are more important. We will not give up the principals our Founding Fathers fought for and many American military men and women died to preserve just to get elected.

 
At 5:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You still don't get it.

Mike might also be in favor of allowing flag-burning because of the constitution, but it wouldn't be politically smart for him to go out of his way to say how much he's in favor of it.

You should be lucky the newspaper didn't quote him. People hate robo-calls.

Military men and women did not die so that politicians can make robo-calls.

 
At 9:58 PM, Blogger Communications guru said...

I’m afraid you don’t get it. What you are talking about is politics as usual: say just what people want to hear, say what’s popular at the moment or lying and stretching the truth just to get elected. Mike and this campaign have never been about politics as usual. He wants to go to Lansing to make a much needed change for our state, and he’s not for sale or there for a free lunch to the tune of $6,000 like our opponent.

I know for a fact that Mike does not support flag burning, and in fact he is dead set against it because its disgusting and insulting to our country and the men and women who have died defending it.

Not all people hate robo calls, and this country has never been about banning speech you don’t like. In fact, it’s what masks this country so special and the greatest democracy in the world. There is no way a ban on robo calls is constitutional nor will a ban survive the first court challenge, so why bother banning them? Why make a law when you know it will not survive? Just to say you did it? No, that’s’ how Mr. Ward operates with most of the bills he has introduced, but it’s not how Mike operates.

It’s better to put some reasonable restrictions in place that will withstand a court challenge and does not infringe on our most important and basic right of all that make robo calls less bothersome and slimy, like requiring the person or group paying for the calls to identify themselves, limiting their time duration or even limiting the hours of the day they can be made.

Of course, “Military men and women did not die so that politicians can make robo-calls,” but they did die defending Freedom of Speech and the Constitution.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home